Tuesday, October 4, 2011

RE Sources files 60 day notice of intent to sue SSA Marine for Clean Water Act violations at Cherry Point

RE Sources files 60 day notice of intent to sue SSA Marine for Clean Water Act violations at Cherry Point
Is SSA’s unpermitted land clearing a sign of what Whatcom County should expect?

Whatcom County— RE Sources for Sustainable Communities today filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue Pacific International Terminals, Inc., SSA Marine’s subsidiary corporation created to develop the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal (GPT) at Cherry Point. The notice is based on Clean Water Act violations committed as part of SSA Marine’s unpermitted clearing of land and wetland modification at the site where SSA plans to build North America’s largest coal terminal.

“We waited patiently for the responsible agencies to take the proper steps when SSA Marine broke the law and violated water quality protections,” said Bob Ferris Executive Director for RE Sources. “They did not, so we are.”

This 60-day notice comes on the heels of wetland scientists at the Department of Ecology criticizing the minimal mitigation requirements issued by Whatcom County’s Planning and Development Services for the retroactive clearing permits, and failure to impose the mandatory six-year permit moratorium. 

“SSA Marine has repeatedly promised to meet or exceed health and environmental protections in developing the Cherry Point coal terminal. Yet the company’s illegal logging is part of a track record of violating environmental safeguards and calls into question whether we can trust this company in the future,” said Matt Krogh, North Sound Baykeeper at RE Sources.

A case in point is SSA’s own discharge reports at Terminal 18 in Seattle over the last year and a half that have shown pollutant levels hundreds of times the state’s allowable standards. This violation is currently the subject of litigation filed by Puget Soundkeeper Alliance in Seattle, Washington.

Another issue of concern for RE Sources is the potential for a biased process in permitting the Gateway Pacific Terminal. Locally, land owners have been served by Whatcom County with land use moratoriums even if they already had permission from the DNR to cut trees—but when SSA had no county permits and no DNR permission to cut more than 9 acres of forest and wetlands, they only received a slap on the wrist from the County.

 “Treating this violation any differently from other violations creates the impression—rightfully or wrongly—of uneven application of the statutes,” said Mr. Ferris.

“Given SSA’s history of exercising political pressure, agencies need to be especially careful to avoid the appearance of undue influence.”
RE Sources is represented by Smith & Lowney, PLLC, of Seattle.

RE Sources is a 501(c) 3 non-profit organization that includes the North Sound Baykeeper.  Neither RE Sources or the North Sound Baykeeper receives direct financial benefits from lawsuits filed under the auspices of the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act.

Bob Ferris (360) 733-8307, bobf@re-sources.org
Matt Krogh (360) 820-2938, mattk@re-sources.org

{Links below to two moratorium examples where the County took unilateral action to find conversion, regardless of DNR permits}

In this example, the DNR provided a permit for clearing, but the County imposed the 6-year moratorium anyway for failure to file the appropriate County paperwork: http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/council/hearing_examiner/decisions/2010/leghorn.pdf 

Similar in this case, except the problem is explicitly that the clear-cutter didn't obtain a County Conversion Option Harvest Plan--clearly indicating that the County, regardless of the DNR Class III Forest Practices permit, felt entitled to impose a 6 year moratorium based on the conversion determination: http://www.co.whatcom.wa.us/council/hearing_examiner/decisions/2009/tramf.pdf


  1. All the post are very useful to implement in our life

  2. Nice comments are posted and very useful

  3. Some articles are related in our life,so nice

  4. The words are so simple and easy to understand

  5. Nice to read all post and more innovative

  6. Peoples are giving a really nice comments for all the article

  7. All the post are good and the peoples are giving nice comment for all post

  8. Really nice,every one should like all the comments

  9. Very useful comments are posted and everybody like this comments

  10. Not only to read the post, need to spreed every one

  11. All the words are simple and every one should understand easily

  12. Need to implement all the information's in my blog

  13. This Comment is very useful and every one should follow this

  14. Keep posting this articles and useful for every one

  15. Peoples are giving the wonderful thoughts for all comments

  16. Your blogs are really good and interesting. It is very great and informative. Planning and Development Services for the retroactive clearing permits, and failure to impose the mandatory six-year permit moratorium Sex Crime Lawyer. I got a lots of useful information in your blog. Keeps sharing more useful blogs..

  17. The recent lawsuit filed by RE Sources against Pacific International has brought attention to the alleged violations at Cherry Point. This legal action sheds light on the importance of environmental protection and holding accountable those who disregard regulations. With RE Sources taking a stand against Pacific International, it is evident that they are committed to safeguarding our natural resources and ensuring responsible industrial practices. In this section, we will delve into the details of the lawsuit and explore the implications it may have on both parties involved and the wider community affected by these violations.
    Visit Us. Do my online course for me